Package funnel
Release hardening sprint
Stability, polish, and “we can submit this” confidence—without rewriting your product from scratch.
Visual preview
Before/after, without hand-waving.
Crash rate (weekly)
Crash-free sessions
+6.1%
Top crash groups
3
Regressions
0
Checks
Green
Stability trending the right way
Hardening is about turning uncertainty into evidence: fewer crash groups, clearer error surfaces, and a checklist you can run before every submission.
- Crash groups → prioritized fixes
- Offline/empty UX
- Build + release checklist
Fit
Ideal for
- Teams close to a store submission or major marketing push
- Apps with “mystery crashes” or flaky networking that need a structured pass
- Products that grew fast and now need a disciplined pre-release checklist
Not the right fit
- Net-new feature development as the primary goal (use a different engagement)
- Backend-only or data-only work with no client app in scope
What you get
Outlined so you can map this to your website, app, or internal tool—before we lock milestones.
Observability & crashes
- Sentry (or equivalent) wiring patterns: breadcrumbs, PII boundaries, release tracking
- Crash clustering notes: what to fix first vs what to monitor
Offline, empty, and sad paths
- Network loss UX: retries, backoff, and honest error copy
- Empty states that don’t feel like bugs (especially for lists and dashboards)
Performance & build hygiene
- Hot paths review: lists, images, and startup sequence
- CI-friendly build notes: what must be green before submission
Roadmap
How you go from 0 → MVP, with artifacts you can hold me to.
Growth curve
We ramp capability, not chaos—each step ends with shippable artifacts and a clearer “next.”
Step 1 · Triage map · Days 1–2
From “we’re nervous to ship” → a prioritized fix map tied to real journeys.
- Top journeys + acceptance criteria (doc)
- Crash/bug triage list (fix now vs monitor) + owners
- Submission risks called out early (store checklist)
Step 2 · Hardening pass · Days 3–7
From flaky → stable: the main flows are reliable under real network + device conditions.
- Offline/empty/error UX pass + retry patterns
- Performance fixes (lists/images/startup) with before/after notes
- CI-friendly build notes: what must be green to submit
Step 3 · Submission pack · End of Week 2
From “almost ready” → “we can submit”: you have the artifacts to ship calmly.
- Regression checklist you can run in < 60 minutes
- Store metadata + review notes pack
- Short support window for submission fallout + fixes
Example scenarios
Illustrative—not a fixed menu. Your product gets the same structure, scoped to your stack and release target.
Pre–App Store submission
Tighten startup, validate permissions flows, and produce a regression checklist your QA (or you) can run in under an hour.
Post-launch firefighting cooldown
Turn noisy crash groups into a prioritized fix list, patch the top offenders, and leave playbooks so the next spike is calmer.
Web + mobile release pair
When the marketing site and the app ship together, align analytics events and deep links so campaigns don’t send users into dead ends.
How we'll run it
- 1Inventory: builds, crash reports, and the top 5 user journeys.
- 2Triage: fix or document each class of failure with acceptance criteria.
- 3Ship: submission pack + regression notes + short post-handoff support.
Scoped milestones, async-friendly reviews, and a written handoff so ownership is obvious on day one.
Next steps
Continue to the site funnel to confirm this package, request a variant, or switch to a fully custom scope with the intake form.